26 Oct Difference between Carbon Neutral and Net Zero
Carbon Neutral vs. Net Zero: What’s the Difference?
As our global awareness of climate change intensifies, so does our familiarity with the terms shaping the discourse. “Net zero” and “carbon neutral” have become buzzwords in the sustainability landscape. From politicians, scientists, to small startups and global business giants like Google, people are increasingly pledging to adopt these initiatives. However, the diverse range of phrases and the lack of clarity around them can create confusion.
Carbon neutrality and Net Zero share the common goal of removing harmful emissions from the atmosphere. However, their nuances lie in the scale and type of emissions they address.
In this blog post, we will shed light on the difference between these two words, both of which are pertinent in our understanding of environmental responsibility.
Carbon-Neutral: Balancing the Equation
Being Carbon Neutral means achieving a balance between the amount of greenhouse gasses emitted and the amount removed from the atmosphere. Carbon-neutrality emphasizes the equilibrium between emitting carbon and absorbing carbon emissions from carbon sinks. Carbon sinks naturally absorb more carbon than they emit, hence by investing in them, companies are able to attain their quest for neutrality.
To be carbon neutral, companies must compensate for their footprint by investing in projects that either reduce or offset an equivalent amount of emissions elsewhere.These projects could include reforestation initiatives, renewable energy projects, or carbon capture technologies.
To achieve carbon neutrality, companies have two primary options. First, they can significantly reduce their carbon emissions, aiming for net-zero. Alternatively, they can balance their emissions through offsetting and the purchase of carbon credits.
This process involves calculating the carbon footprint, identifying emission hotspots, and offsetting the remaining emissions through transparent and community-involved projects.
Becoming Carbon Neutral
Navigating the path towards carbon neutrality entails taking specific measures, and this differs for corporate entities and individuals.
Corporate Initiatives
Businesses strive for carbon neutrality by investing in ‘carbon sinks,’ absorbing CO2 equivalent to their emissions across supply chains.
They must be willing to offset their carbon footprint by engaging in activities that absorb and store more carbon than they emit, allowing companies to balance their emissions responsibly.
Individual Contributions:
Like companies, individuals too can be carbon neutral. Primarily, this entails adopting sustainable lifestyle choices like using public transport, reducing food waste, recycling, and monitoring home energy usage.
Achieving Net Zero
On the other hand, Net Zero goes a step further. While carbon-neutral focuses on balancing emissions, net-zero takes a more proactive approach.
Achieving Net Zero means that the entity in question is not only compensating for its carbon emissions but is actively working to reduce its overall emissions to as close to zero as possible. In the realm of net-zero, no carbon is emitted in the first place, eliminating the need for capture or offsetting.
Net-zero involves emissions reduction strategies following a specific trajectory, often aligned with global temperature targets. This involves implementing sustainable practices, adopting green technologies, and minimizing energy consumption.
For instance, a company running its building entirely on solar energy and avoiding fossil fuels can proudly label its energy as “zero carbon.”
Scopes Matter: Differentiating the Goals
The key difference between carbon neutral and net zero lies in their scopes. Carbon neutral addresses greenhouse gas emissions Scopes 1 and 2, covering direct emissions of a company or specific activities.
In contrast, net zero encompasses the broader Scope 3, accounting for the entire value chain, including supply chain emissions and product end-of-life treatment. Net zero, therefore, represents a more comprehensive, long-term goal for companies aiming to contribute significantly to the fight against climate change.
Another critical distinction lies in the types of offsets required. Carbon neutrality relies on carbon reduction offsets, such as wind farms and solar generation, which reduce future emissions but don’t extract existing carbon from the atmosphere.
Net zero necessitates carbon removal offsets, involving technologies like direct air capture and enhanced mineralization, actively pulling carbon from the atmosphere. While carbon reduction offsets are more cost-effective, carbon removal offsets are pricier and harder to obtain due to the novelty of the technologies involved.
Here are specific differences to note
- Emission Reduction Strategy:
- Carbon Neutral focuses on offsetting emissions through external projects without necessarily reducing emissions at the source.
- Net Zero involves a comprehensive strategy that not only offsets emissions but actively reduces the entity’s carbon footprint through internal measures.
- Timeframe:
- Achieving Carbon Neutrality may be a more immediate goal, as it primarily involves balancing current emissions.
- Net Zero is a long-term commitment, requiring continuous efforts to decrease emissions and transition to sustainable practices over time.
- Scope of Impact:
- Carbon Neutral can be seen as a short-term solution that addresses emissions without fundamentally changing the way an entity operates.
- Net Zero necessitates a holistic approach, influencing organizational structures and processes to minimize environmental impact across the board.
Creating a Greener Future
Achieving carbon neutrality of Net zero requires collaboration between governments, private sector, the third sector, and even individuals. And the benefits far outweigh its cost. While for-profit corporations and their management teams are often in the spotlight for making climate commitments, they are not the sole participants in the fight against climate change. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), nonprofits, and governments at various levels are actively engaging in carbon markets to make their own pledges. Moreover, individuals, including celebrities and public figures, are increasingly taking personal responsibility by offsetting their carbon emissions.
In conclusion, whether an organization aims for carbon neutrality or net zero, the underlying commitment is to reduce and counteract greenhouse gas emissions. As the world collectively addresses the climate crisis, understanding the nuances of these terms becomes crucial for holding stakeholders accountable and fostering a sustainable future.
We Support Policy Clarity with Evidence-Based Insight
At SOStainability, we specialize in guiding businesses, communities, and organizations to successfully integrate sustainability into their strategies. We offer consultations tailored to your unique needs, helping you drive positive change that benefits both your bottom line and the world around you.
Whether you’re looking for sustainability assessments, ethical marketing strategies, or tailored training, our team is here to support your journey.
For consultations or business inquiries, please reach out to us at hello@sostainability.co.uk
No Comments